Bank St Petersburg PJSC & Anor v Arkhangelsky & Ors

Bank St Petersburg PJSC & Anor v Arkhangelsky & Ors

Claimants entitled to costs against Dr Arkhangelsky on standard basis due to failed claims against Mrs Arkhangelskaya and declaratory relief; Mrs Arkhangelskaya entitled to costs for claims against her; Claimants entitled to 75% of costs in counterclaim on standard basis due to conduct and false evidence; interim payments ordered reflecting proportionate recovery; stay of enforcement granted pending determination of application for permission to appeal.

Parties
Claimant: Bank St Petersburg PJSC; Claimant: Alexander Savelyev; Defendant: Vitaly Arkhangelsky; Defendant: Julia Arkhangelskaya; Defendant: Oslo Marine Group Ports LLC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 October 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Consequential Matters
Outcome
Costs orders made as specified; interim payments ordered; stay of enforcement pending appeal application.
Legal Topics
Costs Orders, Interim Payments, Joint and Several Liability, Stay Pending Appeal
Civil Procedure Costs Costs Orders Interim Payments Joint and Several Liability Stay Pending Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bank St Petersburg PJSC

Claimant

Alexander Savelyev

Claimant

Vitaly Arkhangelsky

Defendant

Julia Arkhangelskaya

Defendant

Oslo Marine Group Ports LLC

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Post Judgment Consequential Matters

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate costs orders for main claim and counterclaim
  2. 2 Basis and quantum of interim payments on account of costs
  3. 3 Joint and several liability for costs

Ratio Decidendi

Claimants entitled to costs against Dr Arkhangelsky on standard basis due to failed claims against Mrs Arkhangelskaya and declaratory relief; Mrs Arkhangelskaya entitled to costs for claims against her; Claimants entitled to 75% of costs in counterclaim on standard basis due to conduct and false evidence; interim payments ordered reflecting proportionate recovery; stay of enforcement granted pending determination of application for permission to appeal.

Court Disposition

Costs orders made as specified; interim payments ordered; stay of enforcement pending appeal application.

Orders

  • Dr Arkhangelsky to pay Claimants' costs of Debt Claims on standard basis.
  • Mrs Arkhangelskaya to be paid her costs by Claimants for Debt Claims against her.