Dostenko v City of Westminster
The reviewing officer was not required to make further inquiries into the effect of two months' street homelessness on Mr Dostenko in the absence of evidence or representations indicating a material deterioration in his condition. The decision was not unreasonable or unlawful, and there was no important point of principle or compelling reason to grant permission for a second appeal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Vjacheslav Dostenko; Respondent: City of Westminster
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Bring a Second Appeal
- Outcome
- permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Priority Need for Accommodation, Vulnerability Under Housing Act 1996, Duty to Make Inquiries, Homelessness Reviews
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vjacheslav Dostenko
Appellant
City of Westminster
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Bring a Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reviewing officer was required to make further inquiries into the effect of two months' street homelessness on the applicant's vulnerability under s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996
- 2 Whether failure to make such inquiries vitiated the review decision
Ratio Decidendi
The reviewing officer was not required to make further inquiries into the effect of two months' street homelessness on Mr Dostenko in the absence of evidence or representations indicating a material deterioration in his condition. The decision was not unreasonable or unlawful, and there was no important point of principle or compelling reason to grant permission for a second appeal.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment