Project One London Limited v VMA Services Limited

Project One London Limited v VMA Services Limited

The alleged breaches of natural justice by the adjudicator were either misconceived or immaterial; the adjudicator acted within the permissible bounds of the adjudication process, and the award should be enforced.

Parties
Claimant: Project One London Limited; Defendant: VMA Services Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 December 2025
Procedural Posture
Enforcement of Adjudication Award / Judgment
Outcome
Award enforced
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Natural Justice, Interim Payment Applications
Construction Law Contract Law Adjudication Enforcement Natural Justice Interim Payment Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Project One London Limited

Claimant

VMA Services Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Enforcement of Adjudication Award / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator breached rules of natural justice in making the award
  2. 2 Whether alleged breaches were material to the outcome

Ratio Decidendi

The alleged breaches of natural justice by the adjudicator were either misconceived or immaterial; the adjudicator acted within the permissible bounds of the adjudication process, and the award should be enforced.

Court Disposition

Award enforced

Orders

  • POL is entitled to enforcement of the adjudication award as claimed.
  • Counsel to agree consequential matters or a short remote hearing will be held to resolve outstanding issues.