LIC Telecommunications SARL & Anor v VTB Capital Plc & Ors
The court found that the claims against Delta, Maze, and Mr Veltchev could only be authorised and initiated by V2's shareholder, V Telecom, under Luxembourg law, and that the LICT Managers lacked authority to commence or ratify the proceedings. Quorum and conflict of interest rules were breached, rendering the resolutions invalid. Exclusive jurisdiction clauses were upheld. The removal of V2 as a party was ordered. The claimants' actions were not found to be abusive, but the proceedings were invalid for want of authority.
- Parties
- Claimant: LIC Telecommunications SARL; Claimant: Empreno Ventures Limited; Defendant: VTB Capital PLC; Defendant: Delta Capital International AD; Defendant: Maze SARL; Defendant: Milen Veltchev; Defendant: Viva Luxembourg (Luxembourg) SA; Defendant: Spas Roussev; Defendant: V Telecom Investment SCA; Claimant: V2 Investment SARL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Proceedings (part 7 and Part 20 Applications) / Judgment on Applications Regarding Authority, Ratification, Jurisdiction, Removal, and Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Applications granted in favour of defendants; proceedings commenced by LICT Managers declared invalid for want of authority; V2 removed as party to Original Proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Authority to Commence Proceedings, Ratification of Corporate Actions, Conflict of Interest, Jurisdiction Clauses, Abuse of Process, Shareholder Rights, Luxembourg Company Law, Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses, Standing, Quorum Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LIC Telecommunications SARL
Claimant
Empreno Ventures Limited
Claimant
VTB Capital PLC
Defendant
Delta Capital International AD
Defendant
Maze SARL
Defendant
Milen Veltchev
Defendant
Viva Luxembourg (Luxembourg) SA
Defendant
Spas Roussev
Defendant
V Telecom Investment SCA
Defendant
V2 Investment SARL
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Proceedings (part 7 and Part 20 Applications) / Judgment on Applications Regarding Authority, Ratification, Jurisdiction, Removal, and Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants had authority to commence and ratify proceedings on behalf of V2 and V Telecom
- 2 Whether claims against certain defendants required shareholder approval under Luxembourg law
- 3 Whether quorum and conflict of interest rules were complied with in board meetings
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claims against Delta, Maze, and Mr Veltchev could only be authorised and initiated by V2's shareholder, V Telecom, under Luxembourg law, and that the LICT Managers lacked authority to commence or ratify the proceedings. Quorum and conflict of interest rules were breached, rendering the resolutions invalid. Exclusive jurisdiction clauses were upheld. The removal of V2 as a party was ordered. The claimants' actions were not found to be abusive, but the proceedings were invalid for want of authority.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in favour of defendants; proceedings commenced by LICT Managers declared invalid for want of authority; V2 removed as party to Original Proceedings.
Orders
- The Part 20 and Part 7 proceedings are invalid unless validly ratified.
- V2 is removed as a party to the Original Proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment