VV v VV
A costs order of £100,000 against W is justified due to her litigation conduct, failure on key evidential issues, and the fairness of not protecting her entirely from costs consequences, balanced against H's own disclosure failures.
- Parties
- Applicant: VV; Respondent: VV
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedy Proceedings / Costs Ruling Post Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs order made against respondent (W) for £100,000, set off against lump sum payment.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Disclosure Obligations, Needs Based Analysis, Litigation Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
VV
Applicant
VV
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Proceedings / Costs Ruling Post Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a costs order should be made against the respondent
- 2 Impact of litigation conduct and disclosure failures on costs
- 3 Appropriateness of invading needs-based award for costs
Ratio Decidendi
A costs order of £100,000 against W is justified due to her litigation conduct, failure on key evidential issues, and the fairness of not protecting her entirely from costs consequences, balanced against H's own disclosure failures.
Court Disposition
Costs order made against respondent (W) for £100,000, set off against lump sum payment.
Orders
- W to pay £100,000 towards H's costs, set off against £750,000 lump sum award.
- W's needs-based award to be reduced accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment