R v Vytautas Kiminius
The sentences imposed were within the appropriate guideline ranges, with proper allowance for totality. The notional sentence for cannabis production was justified by the scale, duration, and aggravating features of the offending. There was no arguable basis for appeal on the grounds advanced.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Vytautas Kiminius
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeals, Totality Principle, Dangerous Driving, Drug Offences, Handling Stolen Goods, Proceeds of Crime
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Vytautas Kiminius
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Renew Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notional sentence for production of cannabis was too high
- 2 Whether the total sentence was manifestly excessive
- 3 Whether sufficient allowance was made for totality
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were within the appropriate guideline ranges, with proper allowance for totality. The notional sentence for cannabis production was justified by the scale, duration, and aggravating features of the offending. There was no arguable basis for appeal on the grounds advanced.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- No extension of time granted for renewal of application for leave to appeal against sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment