Fosroc International Ltd v WR Grace & Co - Conn
The amendment does not add matter; the combination of TIPA and TEA was disclosed in the unamended specification. The amended claims are not obvious in light of the prior art, as the skilled person would have no technical motivation to investigate other compounds or combine TIPA and TEA. The patent is not insufficient.
- Parties
- Claimant: Fosroc International Limited; Defendant: W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Revocation and Amendment / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Amendment allowed; amended claims valid.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Amendment, Obviousness, Added Matter, Inventive Step, Insufficiency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fosroc International Limited
Claimant
W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Revocation and Amendment / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed amendment to the patent adds matter contrary to section 76 of the Patents Act 1977 and Article 123(2) EPC
- 2 Whether the amended claims lack inventive step (obviousness)
- 3 Whether the patent is insufficient
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment does not add matter; the combination of TIPA and TEA was disclosed in the unamended specification. The amended claims are not obvious in light of the prior art, as the skilled person would have no technical motivation to investigate other compounds or combine TIPA and TEA. The patent is not insufficient.
Court Disposition
Amendment allowed; amended claims valid.
Orders
- Amendment to claims allowed, subject to directions regarding specification alignment.
- Declaration of validity of amended claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment