W v H

W v H

Findings of substantial breach by Deputy Judge do not survive appeal due to lack of jurisdiction; Deputy Judge's order is a nullity and cannot be relied upon for issue estoppel in enforcement proceedings.

Parties
Applicant: W; Respondent: H
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Family / Ruling on Preliminary Issue (issue Estoppel) in Enforcement Proceedings
Outcome
W's reliance on issue estoppel abandoned; H succeeds on preliminary issue; W to pay costs of determination of estoppel argument.
Legal Topics
Issue Estoppel, Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Undertakings, Costs
Family Law Civil Procedure Issue Estoppel Jurisdiction Enforcement of Undertakings Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

W

Applicant

H

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Ruling on Preliminary Issue (issue Estoppel) in Enforcement Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether findings of substantial breach by Deputy Judge survive appeal for purposes of issue estoppel
  2. 2 Whether Deputy Judge's order is a nullity following Court of Appeal's jurisdictional ruling
  3. 3 Appropriateness of relying on issue estoppel in enforcement proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

Findings of substantial breach by Deputy Judge do not survive appeal due to lack of jurisdiction; Deputy Judge's order is a nullity and cannot be relied upon for issue estoppel in enforcement proceedings.

Court Disposition

W's reliance on issue estoppel abandoned; H succeeds on preliminary issue; W to pay costs of determination of estoppel argument.

Orders

  • W to pay costs of determination of estoppel argument on standard basis, subject to detailed assessment.