R v Wade Terry King
The trial judge exercised judicial discretion correctly in continuing the trial in the applicant's absence and in refusing to exclude confession evidence; the grounds of appeal are without merit.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Wade Terry King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Against Conviction
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal out of time and against conviction refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Trial in Absence, Admissibility of Confession Evidence, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Wade Terry King
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the trial judge erred in continuing the trial in the absence of the applicant
- 2 whether the trial judge erred in refusing to exclude messaging evidence constituting admissions
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge exercised judicial discretion correctly in continuing the trial in the applicant's absence and in refusing to exclude confession evidence; the grounds of appeal are without merit.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal out of time and against conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment