Ahmed v Landstone Leisure Ltd
There is a seriously arguable case that the sale contract and cheque were induced by misrepresentation, and the existence of a genuine cross-claim or counterclaim equal to the amount of the debt means the statutory demand should be set aside. The incorporation of the Special Conditions of Sale was not established, and the principle of circuity of action also applies.
- Parties
- Appellant: Waheed Ahmed; Respondent: Landstone Leisure Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Set Aside Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; statutory demand set aside
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Demand, Misrepresentation, Circuity of Action, Auction Sales, Deposit Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Waheed Ahmed
Appellant
Landstone Leisure Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal to Set Aside Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory demand based on a dishonoured cheque should be set aside due to alleged misrepresentation
- 2 Whether there is a genuine cross-claim or counterclaim equal to the amount of the debt
- 3 Whether the Special Conditions of Sale were incorporated into the contract
Ratio Decidendi
There is a seriously arguable case that the sale contract and cheque were induced by misrepresentation, and the existence of a genuine cross-claim or counterclaim equal to the amount of the debt means the statutory demand should be set aside. The incorporation of the Special Conditions of Sale was not established, and the principle of circuity of action also applies.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; statutory demand set aside
Orders
- Statutory demand set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment