Health and Care Professions Council v Walsh [2019] EWHC 3038 (Admin) (15 October 2019)
The court found that the gravity of the allegations, the risk to patients, and the public interest justified an extension of the interim order, but limited the extension to six months due to the imminent conclusion of the substantive hearing and minimal prejudice to the defendant.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 3038 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Health and Care Professions Council; Defendant: Walsh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Interim Order / Hearing of Application for Extension of Interim Order
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Interim Order, Fitness to Practise, Health and Social Professions Order 2001, Interim Suspension, Protection of the Public
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Health and Care Professions Council
Claimant
Walsh
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Interim Order / Hearing of Application for Extension of Interim Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to extend the interim order against the defendant under Art.31(8) of the Health and Social Professions Order 2001
- 2 Appropriate duration of any extension
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the gravity of the allegations, the risk to patients, and the public interest justified an extension of the interim order, but limited the extension to six months due to the imminent conclusion of the substantive hearing and minimal prejudice to the defendant.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Interim order extended for six months, expiring on 16 April 2020
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment