MMD MINING MACHINERY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v WANG KAI LANG

MMD MINING MACHINERY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v WANG KAI LANG

Clause 10.6 of the 2009 Agreement is valid and enforceable, extinguishing any prior rights or agreements Mr Lang may have claimed in BMMD; no binding Profit-Sharing Agreement or 20% Agreement existed; Mr Lang has no entitlement to rectification, estoppel, or damages for misrepresentation; Clause 10.6 is effective under both English and Chinese law to terminate any personal rights.

Parties
Claimant: MMD Mining Machinery Developments Limited; Claimant: Beijing MMD Mining Machinery Co Limited; Defendant: Wang Kai Lang (also known as Victor Lang)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Declarations granted in favour of Claimants; Defendant's claims dismissed.
Legal Topics
Entire Agreement Clauses, Declaratory Relief, Rectification, Estoppel, Misrepresentation, Chinese Law, Shareholder Rights
Contract Law Company Law International Law Entire Agreement Clauses Declaratory Relief Rectification Estoppel Misrepresentation +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MMD Mining Machinery Developments Limited

Claimant

Beijing MMD Mining Machinery Co Limited

Claimant

Wang Kai Lang (also known as Victor Lang)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Validity and enforceability of Clause 10.6 in the 2009 Agreement
  2. 2 Rectification of the 2009 Agreement
  3. 3 Estoppel by convention

Ratio Decidendi

Clause 10.6 of the 2009 Agreement is valid and enforceable, extinguishing any prior rights or agreements Mr Lang may have claimed in BMMD; no binding Profit-Sharing Agreement or 20% Agreement existed; Mr Lang has no entitlement to rectification, estoppel, or damages for misrepresentation; Clause 10.6 is effective under both English and Chinese law to terminate any personal rights.

Court Disposition

Declarations granted in favour of Claimants; Defendant's claims dismissed.

Orders

  • Clause 10.6 of the 2009 Agreement is valid and enforceable according to its terms.
  • Defendant has no entitlement to rectification of the 2009 Agreement by deletion of Clause 10.6 on grounds of unilateral mistake.