Warren Augustine v Data Cars Limited

Warren Augustine v Data Cars Limited

The Court of Appeal held that although McMenemy v Capita Business Services Ltd was wrongly decided and Regulation 5 should be interpreted to allow claims where part-time status is an effective cause of less favourable treatment, the court is bound to follow McMenemy to maintain consistency across jurisdictions until the Supreme Court decides otherwise.

Parties
Appellant: Warren Augustine; Respondent: Data Cars Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Part Time Workers, Less Favourable Treatment, Causation Test, Implementation of EU Directives, Statutory Interpretation
Employment Law Labour Law Discrimination Law Part Time Workers Less Favourable Treatment Causation Test Implementation of EU Directives Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Warren Augustine

Appellant

Data Cars Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Regulation 5 of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 requires less favourable treatment to be solely on the ground of part-time status or if part-time status as an effective cause suffices
  2. 2 Whether the Court of Appeal should follow the precedent set by McMenemy v Capita Business Services Ltd despite considering it wrongly decided

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that although McMenemy v Capita Business Services Ltd was wrongly decided and Regulation 5 should be interpreted to allow claims where part-time status is an effective cause of less favourable treatment, the court is bound to follow McMenemy to maintain consistency across jurisdictions until the Supreme Court decides otherwise.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court granted