R v Warren Davis

R v Warren Davis

The starting point for sentencing should have been adjusted to reflect the quantity of heroin below the indicative one kilogram, resulting in a lower starting point. Limited mitigation warranted a downward adjustment, and the appellant was entitled to a one-third reduction for early guilty plea. The sentence imposed was excessive and should be reduced.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Warren Davis
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Offences Appeal Against Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Warren Davis

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the starting point for sentencing was correct given the quantity of heroin involved
  2. 2 Whether sufficient credit was given for mitigation
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The starting point for sentencing should have been adjusted to reflect the quantity of heroin below the indicative one kilogram, resulting in a lower starting point. Limited mitigation warranted a downward adjustment, and the appellant was entitled to a one-third reduction for early guilty plea. The sentence imposed was excessive and should be reduced.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Sentence of six years and four months on count 3 quashed
  • Substitute sentence of five years and four months on count 3