Satnam Millennium Ltd v Warrington Borough Council [2015] EWHC 370 (Admin) (19 February 2015)
The Local Plan failed to lawfully identify and include the objectively assessed need for affordable housing as part of the OAN, and there was substantial non-compliance with the requirements for Strategic Environmental Assessment/Sustainability Appraisal under the 2004 Regulations. The process was not unlawfully predetermined, as the later SEA/SA work was found to be independent and not a bolt-on justification for a predetermined strategy.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 370 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Satnam Millennium Limited; Defendant: Warrington Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Local Plan Validity, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Objectively Assessed Need, Affordable Housing, Statutory Interpretation, National Planning Policy Framework
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Satnam Millennium Limited
Claimant
Warrington Borough Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Local Plan failed to identify and address the full, objectively assessed needs for market and affordable housing (OAN) in Warrington
- 2 Whether the Local Plan failed to comply with requirements for Strategic Environmental Assessment/Sustainability Appraisal under EU and domestic law
- 3 Whether the Local Plan process was unlawfully predetermined prior to proper SEA/SA
Ratio Decidendi
The Local Plan failed to lawfully identify and include the objectively assessed need for affordable housing as part of the OAN, and there was substantial non-compliance with the requirements for Strategic Environmental Assessment/Sustainability Appraisal under the 2004 Regulations. The process was not unlawfully predetermined, as the later SEA/SA work was found to be independent and not a bolt-on justification for a predetermined strategy.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- Claim succeeds on Ground 1 Issue 5 (affordable housing OAN not lawfully included)
- Claim succeeds on Ground 2 (SEA/SA non-compliance)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment