D (A Child), Re (Rev 1)
On the balance of probabilities, the injuries sustained by M on 19 April 2016 were caused by non-accidental trauma, specifically shaking, inflicted by the father during a momentary loss of control. This conclusion is supported by unanimous expert medical evidence, the absence of any plausible alternative explanation, and the unreliability of the father's account. The threshold for a care order under s.31(2) Children Act 1989 is met.
- Parties
- Applicant: Warwickshire County Council; 1st Respondent: ID; 2nd Respondent: ML; 3rd Respondent: D (a child by the child’s guardian, Julie Shaw)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Fact Finding Judgment and Final Care Order
- Outcome
- Findings of non-accidental injury against the father; final care order made for the child M.
- Legal Topics
- Non Accidental Injury, Care Orders, Fact Finding Hearings, Burden of Proof, Expert Medical Evidence, Threshold Criteria, Welfare Analysis
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Warwickshire County Council
Applicant
ID
1st Respondent
ML
2nd Respondent
D (a child by the child’s guardian, Julie Shaw)
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Fact Finding Judgment and Final Care Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the injuries sustained by the child M on 19 April 2016 were caused by non-accidental trauma and, if so, whether the father was the perpetrator; Whether the threshold for a care order under s.31(2) Children Act 1989 was met; Whether the injuries could be explained by an unknown or organic cause; Appropriate welfare disposal for the child
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the injuries sustained by M on 19 April 2016 were caused by non-accidental trauma, specifically shaking, inflicted by the father during a momentary loss of control. This conclusion is supported by unanimous expert medical evidence, the absence of any plausible alternative explanation, and the unreliability of the father's account. The threshold for a care order under s.31(2) Children Act 1989 is met.
Court Disposition
Findings of non-accidental injury against the father; final care order made for the child M.
Orders
- Final care order in favour of the local authority for M.
- Therapeutic work with both parents to continue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment