Nosnehpetsj Ltd v Watersheds Capital Partners Ltd & Anor
The court found that the ordinary shares in Watersheds Capital Partners Limited were equitably assigned to Nosnephetsj Limited based on the intention to transfer, the documentary evidence, and the absence of contrary records, and that it would be unconscionable to recall the gift after group tax relief was claimed. The purported redemption of preference shares was invalid as statutory requirements were not met, and the shares were redeemable at £2 per share. The claim for unlawful capital reduction failed as no loss was established.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nosnephetsj Limited (in Liquidation); Defendant: Watersheds Capital Partners Limited; Defendant: Richard Buzzoni
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency/company Law / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; relief to be determined at further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Share Ownership, Equitable Assignment, Redemption of Preference Shares, Capital Reduction, Directors' Duties, Adverse Inferences From Missing Records
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nosnephetsj Limited (in Liquidation)
Claimant
Watersheds Capital Partners Limited
Defendant
Richard Buzzoni
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Insolvency/company Law / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ordinary shares in Watersheds Capital Partners Limited were transferred to Nosnephetsj Limited and constituted an equitable assignment
- 2 Whether the redemption of preference shares was valid and at what value
- 3 Whether there was an unlawful capital reduction and breach of statutory requirements
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ordinary shares in Watersheds Capital Partners Limited were equitably assigned to Nosnephetsj Limited based on the intention to transfer, the documentary evidence, and the absence of contrary records, and that it would be unconscionable to recall the gift after group tax relief was claimed. The purported redemption of preference shares was invalid as statutory requirements were not met, and the shares were redeemable at £2 per share. The claim for unlawful capital reduction failed as no loss was established.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; relief to be determined at further hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment