Morgan, R. v [2026] EWCA Crim 94 (27 January 2026)

The original sentence failed to reflect the overall gravity of the offending, particularly given the number of offences and aggravating features. The most serious offence warranted a higher custodial term, and the total sentence was increased accordingly.

Citation: [2026] EWCA Crim 94
Parties: Prosecution: Rex; Respondent: Wayne Morgan
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 27 January 2026
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome: Sentence increased on Attorney General's Reference; application granted.
Legal Topics: Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Child Protection, Attorney General's Reference, Extended Sentences, Sexual Harm Prevention Orders

Criminal Law Sentencing Sexual Offences Child Protection Attorney General's Reference Extended Sentences Sexual Harm Prevention Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Wayne Morgan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

1 Whether the original sentence was unduly lenient
2 Appropriate categorisation of harm and culpability under Sentencing Council Guidelines
3 Whether the Sexual Harm Prevention Order should have included internet restrictions

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Sentence increased on Attorney General's Reference; application granted.

Orders

Sentence on count 5 quashed and substituted with an extended sentence of 10 years (8 years custody, 2 years extended licence)
Other sentences to remain concurrent and unchanged