Bishop, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 1446 (27 May 2011)
The appeal was allowed because the sentencing judge failed to sufficiently investigate and consider the arrangements and impact on the appellant's children, as required by established legal principles. The custodial sentences were suspended to mitigate the hardship on the children, while maintaining the punitive aspect of the sentence.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Crim 1446
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Wayne Steven Bishop
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerous Driving, Burglary, Impact on Children, Suspended Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Wayne Steven Bishop
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge gave sufficient consideration to the impact of imprisonment on the appellant's children
- 2 Whether the custodial sentences should have been suspended given the appellant's family circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the sentencing judge failed to sufficiently investigate and consider the arrangements and impact on the appellant's children, as required by established legal principles. The custodial sentences were suspended to mitigate the hardship on the children, while maintaining the punitive aspect of the sentence.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The consecutive sentences of 4 months each for burglary and dangerous driving are suspended for 2 years.
- Supervision requirement for 12 months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment