Sharon Jane Sharpe v Wayne Terrance Dyson & Anor.
The Defendants failed to prove that Mrs Sharpe made any false representations to Mr Dale about them, or that any such representations caused him to change his will. Mr Dale acted as a free agent, with capacity, and on independent legal advice. The 2019 will was not procured by fraudulent calumny.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sharon Jane Sharpe; Defendant: Wayne Terrance Dyson; Defendant: Andrew George Ellis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Probate/contentious Will Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; Defence and Counterclaim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Calumny, Testamentary Capacity, Undue Influence, Wills, Grant of Probate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sharon Jane Sharpe
Claimant
Wayne Terrance Dyson
Defendant
Andrew George Ellis
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate/contentious Will Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2019 will of Brian Dale was procured by the fraudulent calumny of Sharon Jane Sharpe
- 2 Whether the 2003 will should be propounded instead
- 3 Whether the actions of the Defendants justified their disinheritance
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendants failed to prove that Mrs Sharpe made any false representations to Mr Dale about them, or that any such representations caused him to change his will. Mr Dale acted as a free agent, with capacity, and on independent legal advice. The 2019 will was not procured by fraudulent calumny.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; Defence and Counterclaim dismissed
Orders
- The Court pronounces for the force and validity of the last will of Brian Dale dated 16 August 2019.
- A grant of probate is decreed in favour of Sharon Jane Sharpe and Riki Ann Sharpe in solemn form.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment