WC v HC

WC v HC

W's negotiation stance was unreasonable and her claims were disproportionate compared to the final award, while H's offers were closer to the outcome. Although both parties had litigation conduct issues, W bore greater responsibility. Therefore, W is ordered to pay £150,000 towards H's costs, set off against her substantive award.

Parties
Applicant: WC; Respondent: HC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Proceedings / Costs Ruling After Substantive Judgment
Outcome
Costs order granted in favour of H; W to pay £150,000 towards H's costs, set off against her award.
Legal Topics
Financial Remedies, Costs Orders, Needs Based Awards, Litigation Conduct
Family Law Financial Remedies Costs Orders Needs Based Awards Litigation Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WC

Applicant

HC

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Financial Remedy Proceedings / Costs Ruling After Substantive Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a costs order should be made in financial remedy proceedings based on parties' conduct and offers to settle
  2. 2 Whether the needs-based award insulates the payee from a costs penalty

Ratio Decidendi

W's negotiation stance was unreasonable and her claims were disproportionate compared to the final award, while H's offers were closer to the outcome. Although both parties had litigation conduct issues, W bore greater responsibility. Therefore, W is ordered to pay £150,000 towards H's costs, set off against her substantive award.

Court Disposition

Costs order granted in favour of H; W to pay £150,000 towards H's costs, set off against her award.

Orders

  • W to pay £150,000 to H by way of costs, set off against the substantive award.