Instrument Product Development Ltd v W D Engineering Solutions Ltd [2022] EWHC 1994 (Ch) (26 July 2022)
The original oral agreement between IPD and WDES, as formed on 6 March 2017, was limited to the Cannes Nespresso pilot store. Subsequent orders for Madison, Washington, Mexico, Portugal, the UK, and Lausanne were added by specific variations agreed between the parties. There was no agreement, express or implied, that the profit share arrangement extended to the entire Nespresso rollout. The evidence, including contemporaneous emails and conduct, did not support IPD's claim to a profit share in the wider project.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 1994 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Instrument Product Development Ltd; Defendant: WD Engineering Solutions Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Oral Contracts, Variation of Contract, Profit Sharing Agreements, Joint Venture Arrangements, Reliability of Witness Memory
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Instrument Product Development Ltd
Claimant
WD Engineering Solutions Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / High Court Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the oral agreement between IPD and WDES covered only the Cannes Nespresso pilot or the wider Nespresso rollout
- 2 Whether subsequent conduct and variations extended the agreement to further stores
- 3 Whether IPD was entitled to a profit share from the wider Nespresso project
Ratio Decidendi
The original oral agreement between IPD and WDES, as formed on 6 March 2017, was limited to the Cannes Nespresso pilot store. Subsequent orders for Madison, Washington, Mexico, Portugal, the UK, and Lausanne were added by specific variations agreed between the parties. There was no agreement, express or implied, that the profit share arrangement extended to the entire Nespresso rollout. The evidence, including contemporaneous emails and conduct, did not support IPD's claim to a profit share in the wider project.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's claim for profit share in the wider Nespresso rollout is dismissed.
- No order for profit share beyond the specifically agreed pilot stores.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment