Martin Grant Homes Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v Wealden District Council [2005] EWHC 453 (Admin) (04 March 2005)
The Council's decision to abandon the statutory local plan process was unlawful because the transitional provisions in Schedule 8 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 required continuation of the statutory process, and there were no exceptional circumstances justifying departure from the statutory code. Efficiency and cost-saving are not sufficient reasons to override statutory requirements.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 453 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Martin Grant Homes Limited; Claimant: Taylor Woodrow Developments Limited; Defendant: Wealden District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; decision to abandon local plan process quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Local Plan Withdrawal, Transitional Provisions Under Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, Statutory Interpretation, Development Frameworks, Judicial Review of Local Authority Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Grant Homes Limited
Claimant
Taylor Woodrow Developments Limited
Claimant
Wealden District Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Wealden District Council lawfully abandoned the statutory local plan process in favour of a non-statutory plan and commencement of a Local Development Framework under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
- 2 Whether the transitional provisions in Schedule 8 of the 2004 Act required continuation of the statutory local plan process
- 3 Whether there existed lawful grounds for departing from the statutory transitional arrangements
Ratio Decidendi
The Council's decision to abandon the statutory local plan process was unlawful because the transitional provisions in Schedule 8 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 required continuation of the statutory process, and there were no exceptional circumstances justifying departure from the statutory code. Efficiency and cost-saving are not sufficient reasons to override statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; decision to abandon local plan process quashed.
Orders
- Quashing order granted in respect of the Council's decision to abandon the statutory local plan process.
- Council ordered to continue with the statutory local plan process under the 1990 Act as modified by the 2004 Act transitional provisions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment