Khurana & Anor v Webster Construction Ltd [2015] EWHC 758 (TCC) (20 March 2015)
The parties, through their solicitors, agreed that the adjudicator's decision would be finally binding, precluding further litigation on the same dispute. The term was individually negotiated, not unfair, and expressed in plain, intelligible language. All claims now sought by the claimants are already finally determined by the adjudicator and cannot proceed.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 758 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Anjali Khurana; Claimant: Mohit Khurana; Defendant: Webster Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Construction Dispute / Application to Stay or Dismiss Proceedings Post Adjudication
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; proceedings stayed
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Agreements, Binding Effect of Adjudicator's Decision, Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Res Judicata in Adjudication, Dispute Resolution Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anjali Khurana
Claimant
Mohit Khurana
Claimant
Webster Construction Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Construction Dispute / Application to Stay or Dismiss Proceedings Post Adjudication
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator's decision is finally binding and precludes further litigation
- 2 Whether the term is unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999
- 3 Extent of matters finally determined by adjudication
Ratio Decidendi
The parties, through their solicitors, agreed that the adjudicator's decision would be finally binding, precluding further litigation on the same dispute. The term was individually negotiated, not unfair, and expressed in plain, intelligible language. All claims now sought by the claimants are already finally determined by the adjudicator and cannot proceed.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; proceedings stayed
Orders
- Claim set aside and proceedings stayed on jurisdictional grounds
- Summary judgment would have been granted against claimants for repayment of adjudicator's fees if claim not dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment