Teklu, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 1477 (22 September 2017)
The judge was entitled to conclude that the offence involved significant planning and that the complainant was particularly vulnerable, justifying categorisation as a category 2A offence and a sentence at the top of the range; the sentence of four years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating features and was within the judge's discretion.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Crim 1477
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Weldegabriel Teklu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Assault, Sentencing, Appeal, Aggravating Factors, Vulnerability of Victim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Weldegabriel Teklu
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the offence involved a significant degree of planning justifying categorisation as category 2A under sentencing guidelines
- 2 Whether the sentence of four years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the appellant's previous good character
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to conclude that the offence involved significant planning and that the complainant was particularly vulnerable, justifying categorisation as a category 2A offence and a sentence at the top of the range; the sentence of four years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating features and was within the judge's discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Sentence of four years' imprisonment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment