Teklu, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 1477 (22 September 2017)

Teklu, R. v [2017] EWCA Crim 1477 (22 September 2017)

The judge was entitled to conclude that the offence involved significant planning and that the complainant was particularly vulnerable, justifying categorisation as a category 2A offence and a sentence at the top of the range; the sentence of four years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating features and was within the judge's discretion.

Citation
[2017] EWCA Crim 1477
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Weldegabriel Teklu
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 September 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Sentencing, Appeal, Aggravating Factors, Vulnerability of Victim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Weldegabriel Teklu

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the offence involved a significant degree of planning justifying categorisation as category 2A under sentencing guidelines
  2. 2 Whether the sentence of four years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the appellant's previous good character

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to conclude that the offence involved significant planning and that the complainant was particularly vulnerable, justifying categorisation as a category 2A offence and a sentence at the top of the range; the sentence of four years' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating features and was within the judge's discretion.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Sentence of four years' imprisonment upheld