Western Power Distribution Investments Ltd. v Welsh Ministers [2010] EWHC 800 (Admin) (22 February 2010)
The decision to list Llanishen Reservoir was not irrational or unlawful. The Welsh Ministers were entitled to list the reservoir on the basis of its historic interest as part of a major civic engineering scheme, and the decision was within the scope of the statutory criteria and policy. There was no requirement for new evidence akin to appellate standards, and the focus of the 2008 request justified reconsideration. The court declined to interfere with the decision.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 800 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Western Power Distribution Investments Limited; Defendant: Welsh Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Listed Buildings, Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation, Planning Policy, Heritage Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Western Power Distribution Investments Limited
Claimant
Welsh Ministers
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision to list Llanishen Reservoir as a building of special architectural or historic interest was lawful under Section 1 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990
- 2 Whether the Welsh Ministers acted irrationally or unlawfully in departing from policy or failing to select only the best examples for listing
- 3 Whether new evidence justified reconsideration of a previous decision not to list
Ratio Decidendi
The decision to list Llanishen Reservoir was not irrational or unlawful. The Welsh Ministers were entitled to list the reservoir on the basis of its historic interest as part of a major civic engineering scheme, and the decision was within the scope of the statutory criteria and policy. There was no requirement for new evidence akin to appellate standards, and the focus of the 2008 request justified reconsideration. The court declined to interfere with the decision.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim for judicial review dismissed
- Claimant to pay the defendant's costs, assessed summarily at £21,596.00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment