Cardiff County Council, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers
The Welsh Ministers were entitled to determine that EK was no longer provided with residential accommodation under section 21(1)(a) of the National Assistance Act 1948 after moving to a housing association tenancy, and that Cardiff County Council is responsible for funding her care. The decision was not irrational, unreasonable, or wrong in law, and there was no breach of legitimate expectation or the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cardiff County Council; Defendant: Welsh Ministers; Interested Party: Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Ordinary Residence, Provision of Care, Statutory Interpretation, Legitimate Expectation, Disability Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cardiff County Council
Claimant
Welsh Ministers
Defendant
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Welsh Ministers erred in determining that Cardiff County Council is responsible for funding EK's care
- 2 Whether EK continued to be provided with residential accommodation under section 21(1)(a) of the National Assistance Act 1948 after moving to a housing association tenancy
- 3 Whether the Welsh Ministers misconstrued the statutory scheme and relevant case law
Ratio Decidendi
The Welsh Ministers were entitled to determine that EK was no longer provided with residential accommodation under section 21(1)(a) of the National Assistance Act 1948 after moving to a housing association tenancy, and that Cardiff County Council is responsible for funding her care. The decision was not irrational, unreasonable, or wrong in law, and there was no breach of legitimate expectation or the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Within 14 days the parties shall submit either a draft consent order on the issue of costs or written submissions on that issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment