Northern Ireland judgment
The Welsh Ministers lawfully adopted the Plan after a process that properly identified, described, and evaluated all reasonable alternatives capable of meeting the objectives, as required by the SEA Directive and the 2004 Regulations. The Minister did not breach the section 28G duty, having taken reasonable steps to mitigate harm to SSSIs. The decisions were rational, lawful, and adequately reasoned.
- Parties
- Claimant: Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland Limited; Defendant: Welsh Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
- Outcome
- Application refused; permission granted for Grounds 1 and 2, but substantive claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive, Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, Transport Planning, Judicial Review, Duty to Consider Reasonable Alternatives, Duty to Conserve and Enhance Sssis
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland Limited
Claimant
Welsh Ministers
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Rolled Up Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Welsh Ministers' adoption of the M4 Corridor Around Newport Plan complied with the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive and the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes (Wales) Regulations 2004
- 2 Whether the Welsh Ministers breached their duty under section 28G of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to further the conservation and enhancement of SSSIs
Ratio Decidendi
The Welsh Ministers lawfully adopted the Plan after a process that properly identified, described, and evaluated all reasonable alternatives capable of meeting the objectives, as required by the SEA Directive and the 2004 Regulations. The Minister did not breach the section 28G duty, having taken reasonable steps to mitigate harm to SSSIs. The decisions were rational, lawful, and adequately reasoned.
Court Disposition
Application refused; permission granted for Grounds 1 and 2, but substantive claim dismissed.
Orders
- Permission to proceed refused for Ground 3.
- Permission to proceed granted for Grounds 1 and 2.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment