Wendy Stephen v The Information Commissioner & Anor
The Tribunal found that the Ministry of Justice conducted reasonable and intelligent searches in areas most likely to hold the requested information, and that, on the balance of probabilities, no further relevant information was held at the time of the request. Speculation about what should exist or administrative errors did not alter this conclusion.
- Parties
- Appellant: Wendy Stephen; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: The Ministry of Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act, Disclosure of Information, Public Authority Record Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wendy Stephen
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
The Ministry of Justice
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ministry of Justice held further information within the scope of the FOIA request at the time the request was made
- 2 Adequacy of searches conducted by the Ministry of Justice
- 3 Application of the balance of probabilities test to determine if information is held
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Ministry of Justice conducted reasonable and intelligent searches in areas most likely to hold the requested information, and that, on the balance of probabilities, no further relevant information was held at the time of the request. Speculation about what should exist or administrative errors did not alter this conclusion.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment