R v Wesley Grainger Smith

R v Wesley Grainger Smith

The sentence of 28 months' imprisonment was justified and not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, prolonged nature, and repeated fraudulent conduct, despite full repayment and significant mitigation; only immediate custody was appropriate.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Wesley Grainger Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 November 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Removal of Property, Company Director Disqualification, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation, Repayment of Funds
Criminal Law Insolvency Law Fraudulent Removal of Property Company Director Disqualification Sentencing Guidelines Mitigation Repayment of Funds

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Wesley Grainger Smith

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the sentence of 28 months' imprisonment was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 whether sufficient weight was given to mitigation including repayment and personal circumstances
  3. 3 whether the appropriate discount for guilty plea was applied

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 28 months' imprisonment was justified and not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, prolonged nature, and repeated fraudulent conduct, despite full repayment and significant mitigation; only immediate custody was appropriate.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused

Orders

  • leave to appeal against sentence refused