Davison, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 484 (30 April 2024)

Davison, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 484 (30 April 2024)

There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence. The applicant's complaints about representation, jury prejudice, disclosure, and sentencing were unfounded or immaterial. The sentence was within the guidelines and not manifestly excessive. No extension of time was justified.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Crim 484
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Wesley Kevin Davison
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Attempted Robbery, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Extension of Time, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jury Prejudice, Disclosure Obligations, Sentencing Guidelines
Criminal Law Attempted Robbery Appeal Against Conviction Appeal Against Sentence Extension of Time Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Jury Prejudice Disclosure Obligations +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Wesley Kevin Davison

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence After Refusal by Single Judge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against conviction
  2. 2 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against sentence
  3. 3 Whether an extension of time should be granted for appeal

Ratio Decidendi

There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence. The applicant's complaints about representation, jury prejudice, disclosure, and sentencing were unfounded or immaterial. The sentence was within the guidelines and not manifestly excessive. No extension of time was justified.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Application for extension of time refused
  • Application for leave to appeal conviction refused