R v Wesley Kevin Davison

R v Wesley Kevin Davison

There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence. The applicant's complaints about representation, jury prejudice, judicial conduct, and disclosure failures were unfounded or immaterial. The sentence was within guidelines and not manifestly excessive. No extension of time was justified.

Parties
Applicant: Wesley Kevin Davison; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Attempted Robbery, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Extension of Time, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jury Prejudice, Disclosure Obligations, Sentencing Guidelines

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wesley Kevin Davison

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence

  1. 1 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against conviction for attempted robbery
  2. 2 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against sentence
  3. 3 Whether extension of time to appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence. The applicant's complaints about representation, jury prejudice, judicial conduct, and disclosure failures were unfounded or immaterial. The sentence was within guidelines and not manifestly excessive. No extension of time was justified.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Application for extension of time refused
  • Application for leave to appeal conviction refused