R v Wesley Kevin Davison
There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence. The applicant's complaints about representation, jury prejudice, judicial conduct, and disclosure failures were unfounded or immaterial. The sentence was within guidelines and not manifestly excessive. No extension of time was justified.
- Parties
- Applicant: Wesley Kevin Davison; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Robbery, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Extension of Time, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, Jury Prejudice, Disclosure Obligations, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wesley Kevin Davison
Applicant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against conviction for attempted robbery
- 2 Whether there are arguable grounds for appeal against sentence
- 3 Whether extension of time to appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence. The applicant's complaints about representation, jury prejudice, judicial conduct, and disclosure failures were unfounded or immaterial. The sentence was within guidelines and not manifestly excessive. No extension of time was justified.
Court Disposition
applications refused
Orders
- Application for extension of time refused
- Application for leave to appeal conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment