Faraday Development Ltd, R (on the application of) v West Berkshire Council & Anor
West Berkshire Council complied with its statutory duty under section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972, properly considered relevant factors, and lawfully structured the Development Agreement so as not to impose enforceable obligations triggering procurement legislation. The Development Agreement is not a public works contract within the meaning of procurement law, and the Council's approach was not irrational.
- Parties
- Claimant: Faraday Development Limited; Defendant: West Berkshire Council; Interested Party: St Modwen Developments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review and Statutory Claim Under Public Contracts Regulations / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claims for judicial review and statutory claim under Part 6 of the Public Contracts Regulations dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Best Consideration Duty, Public Works Contracts, Procurement Regime, Land Disposal, Rationality in Decision Making
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Faraday Development Limited
Claimant
West Berkshire Council
Defendant
St Modwen Developments Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review and Statutory Claim Under Public Contracts Regulations / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether West Berkshire Council complied with its duty under section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972 to obtain best consideration reasonably obtainable for land disposal
- 2 Whether the Development Agreement constituted a public works contract subject to procurement legislation
- 3 Whether the Council's decision to structure the agreement to avoid procurement obligations was irrational
Ratio Decidendi
West Berkshire Council complied with its statutory duty under section 123 of the Local Government Act 1972, properly considered relevant factors, and lawfully structured the Development Agreement so as not to impose enforceable obligations triggering procurement legislation. The Development Agreement is not a public works contract within the meaning of procurement law, and the Council's approach was not irrational.
Court Disposition
Claims for judicial review and statutory claim under Part 6 of the Public Contracts Regulations dismissed.
Orders
- Defendant awarded costs on standard basis.
- Permission to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment