H (A Child), Re (Interim Care Order : fact finding)

H (A Child), Re (Interim Care Order : fact finding)

The parents, through misreporting, exaggeration, and manipulation of H's medical symptoms and treatment, caused him significant physical and emotional harm, including unnecessary medical interventions, deprivation of education, and risk to life. Both parents covertly tampered with medical equipment, and M's bullying...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Westminster City Council; 1st Respondent: M; 2nd Respondent: F; 3rd Respondent: H
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (public Law) / Fact Finding Judgment
Outcome
Findings of significant harm; threshold for care order met
Legal Topics
Fact Finding Hearing, Interim Care Order, Significant Harm, Medical Evidence, Parental Conduct, Hearsay Evidence, Threshold Criteria
Family Law Child Protection Fact Finding Hearing Interim Care Order Significant Harm Medical Evidence Parental Conduct Hearsay Evidence +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Westminster City Council

Applicant

M

1st Respondent

F

2nd Respondent

H

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Care Proceedings (public Law) / Fact Finding Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the parents misreported or exaggerated H's medical symptoms
  2. 2 Whether the parents tampered with H's medical equipment
  3. 3 Whether the parents' conduct caused significant harm to H

Ratio Decidendi

The parents, through misreporting, exaggeration, and manipulation of H's medical symptoms and treatment, caused him significant physical and emotional harm, including unnecessary medical interventions, deprivation of education, and risk to life. Both parents covertly tampered with medical equipment, and M's bullying behaviour undermined professional care. The threshold for significant harm under the Children Act 1989 was met.

Court Disposition

Findings of significant harm; threshold for care order met

Orders

  • Judgment to be placed on H's medical records and made available to relevant professionals
  • Parents to be distanced from involvement in H's medical care, physiotherapy, or therapeutic support