Departmento De Investigacao E Accao Penal De Lisboa Portugal, R (on the application of) v Westminster Magistrates Court
Permission to bring judicial review proceedings is refused because District Judge Purdy's decision was not arguably erroneous in law; the passage of time and prosecution delays rendered further prosecution oppressive under section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Departmento de Investigacao e Accao Penal de Lisboa Portugal; Defendant: Westminster Magistrates Court; Interested Party: Mr Azevedo
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission Application
- Outcome
- permission refused
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, Judicial Review, Passage of Time, Oppression, Costs Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Departmento de Investigacao e Accao Penal de Lisboa Portugal
Claimant
Westminster Magistrates Court
Defendant
Mr Azevedo
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether District Judge Purdy erred in refusing consent for further prosecution of Mr Azevedo due to passage of time under Extradition Act 2003 section 14
- 2 Whether the passage of time rendered further prosecution oppressive or unjust
- 3 Whether delay in issuing judicial review proceedings affected permission
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to bring judicial review proceedings is refused because District Judge Purdy's decision was not arguably erroneous in law; the passage of time and prosecution delays rendered further prosecution oppressive under section 14 of the Extradition Act 2003.
Court Disposition
permission refused
Orders
- Costs summarily assessed at £5,000 plus VAT to be paid by CPS Extradition Unit within 21 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment