Oliver v Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust & Anor
The master erred in concluding that the prospects of success should have been assessed at 60% rather than 50%. The assessment at the time of entering the CFA was that the claim had uncertain prospects, possibly lower than 50%, justifying a 100% success fee. The appeal is allowed and the success fee restored to 100%.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: David Ian Oliver (Executor of the estate of John Frederick Oliver Deceased); Defendant: Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust; Defendant: Waltham Forest Primary Care Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Fee Agreements, Success Fees, Costs Assessment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Ian Oliver (Executor of the estate of John Frederick Oliver Deceased)
Claimant
Whipps Cross University Hospital NHS Trust
Defendant
Waltham Forest Primary Care Trust
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the success fee in the conditional fee agreement should be assessed at 100% or reduced to 67%
- 2 Whether the prospects of success at the time of entering the CFA justified a 100% success fee
Ratio Decidendi
The master erred in concluding that the prospects of success should have been assessed at 60% rather than 50%. The assessment at the time of entering the CFA was that the claim had uncertain prospects, possibly lower than 50%, justifying a 100% success fee. The appeal is allowed and the success fee restored to 100%.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Success fee restored to 100%
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment