Whitbread Group Plc v Customs & Excise
The Tribunal was entitled to find as a matter of fact that the entire departure lounge constitutes the 'premises' for VAT purposes, and that supplies of cold food therein are standard-rated as catering. Supplies to staff with discount cards and to passengers intending to consume food only on the aircraft, if...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Whitbread Group Plc; Respondent: The Commissioners of Customs & Excise
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, Zero Rating, Definition of Premises, Catering Services, Appeal on Point of Law
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Whitbread Group Plc
Appellant
The Commissioners of Customs & Excise
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether supplies of cold food by Costa Ltd in airport departure lounges should be zero-rated or standard-rated for VAT purposes
- 2 Whether the departure lounge constitutes 'premises' for the purposes of VAT Act 1994 Schedule 8 Note (3)
- 3 Whether the supplies constitute 'catering' in the ordinary sense or by statutory extension
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to find as a matter of fact that the entire departure lounge constitutes the 'premises' for VAT purposes, and that supplies of cold food therein are standard-rated as catering. Supplies to staff with discount cards and to passengers intending to consume food only on the aircraft, if evidenced, may be zero-rated, but no sufficient evidence was provided in this case.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's decision upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment