White Fish Limited v The Pensions Regulator

White Fish Limited v The Pensions Regulator

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with a tribunal direction requiring confirmation of their intention to proceed and failed to respond despite being warned that non-compliance could result in strike out.

Parties
Applicant: WHITE FISH LIMITED; Respondent: THE PENSIONS REGULATOR
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 September 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Strike Out Application
Outcome
Appeal struck out
Legal Topics
Tribunal Procedure, Strike Out, Non Compliance With Directions
Administrative Law Regulatory Law Tribunal Procedure Strike Out Non Compliance With Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WHITE FISH LIMITED

Applicant

THE PENSIONS REGULATOR

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Strike Out Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be struck out for failure to comply with tribunal directions

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with a tribunal direction requiring confirmation of their intention to proceed and failed to respond despite being warned that non-compliance could result in strike out.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out.