Paramasivan v Wicks

Paramasivan v Wicks

The defendant was not negligent in driving at 25 mph given the circumstances and the position of the group of youngsters, but was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout and respond to the claimant's sudden emergence. The failure to keep a proper lookout was causative of the injury, and the appropriate apportionment of liability is 75% contributory negligence to the claimant and 25% to the defendant.

Parties
Respondent: Paramasivan; Appellant: Wicks
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Liability in Road Traffic Accident
Outcome
Appeal allowed; liability apportioned 75% to claimant, 25% to defendant.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Causation, Apportionment of Liability, Road Traffic Accidents
Tort Law Personal Injury Negligence Contributory Negligence Causation Apportionment of Liability Road Traffic Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paramasivan

Respondent

Wicks

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment on Liability in Road Traffic Accident

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout
  2. 2 Whether the defendant's speed was unreasonable in the circumstances
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's breach of duty caused the claimant's injury

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was not negligent in driving at 25 mph given the circumstances and the position of the group of youngsters, but was negligent in failing to keep a proper lookout and respond to the claimant's sudden emergence. The failure to keep a proper lookout was causative of the injury, and the appropriate apportionment of liability is 75% contributory negligence to the claimant and 25% to the defendant.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; liability apportioned 75% to claimant, 25% to defendant.

Orders

  • Substitution of liability apportionment to 75% contributory negligence by claimant and 25% by defendant.