Wiles v Social Security Commissioner & Anor
Judicial review does in principle lie against a commissioner's refusal of leave to appeal on conventional public law grounds. In this case, there was sufficient evidence of a relevant change in the claimant's medical condition to justify the supersession of her incapacity benefit award, and no material error of law...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Wiles; Respondent: Social Security Commissioner & Another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (appeal) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Leave to Appeal, Incapacity Benefit, Change of Circumstances, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wiles
Appellant
Social Security Commissioner & Another
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (appeal) / Appeal From Refusal of Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 In what circumstances should an application for judicial review of a social security commissioner's refusal of permission to appeal be entertained?
- 2 Was there a relevant change of circumstances justifying the supersession of the appellant's incapacity benefit award?
Ratio Decidendi
Judicial review does in principle lie against a commissioner's refusal of leave to appeal on conventional public law grounds. In this case, there was sufficient evidence of a relevant change in the claimant's medical condition to justify the supersession of her incapacity benefit award, and no material error of law was established.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no order for remission; the refusal of permission to apply for judicial review stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment