West African Gas Pipeline Company Ltd v Willbros Global Holdings Inc
WAPCo's failures in de-duplication, document gathering, and review caused wasted costs for WGH. The court ordered WAPCo to pay specified percentages of WGH's costs for duplicates, redactions, and additional tranches, but declined to vary the original costs order from 6 October 2011. Payment on account was set at £135,000.
- Parties
- Claimant: West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited; Defendant: Willbros Global Holdings Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Costs Applications Following Disclosure Disputes
- Outcome
- Costs orders granted in part; original costs order not varied.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Costs, Electronic Disclosure, Case Management, International Construction Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited
Claimant
Willbros Global Holdings Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Costs Applications Following Disclosure Disputes
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs order made on 6 October 2011 should be varied or set aside
- 2 Whether WGH is entitled to wasted costs due to deficiencies in WAPCo's disclosure
- 3 Appropriate allocation of costs for duplicate documents, redactions, and prolonged disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
WAPCo's failures in de-duplication, document gathering, and review caused wasted costs for WGH. The court ordered WAPCo to pay specified percentages of WGH's costs for duplicates, redactions, and additional tranches, but declined to vary the original costs order from 6 October 2011. Payment on account was set at £135,000.
Court Disposition
Costs orders granted in part; original costs order not varied.
Orders
- WAPCo to pay WGH's costs of applications in paragraphs 3 to 6 of the application of 21 November 2011 in any event, assessed on a standard basis.
- WAPCo to pay 80% of WGH's costs of dealing with duplicate documents identified in Herbert Smith's letter of 21 December 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment