Malcolm vMackenzie & Ors
The differential treatment of pension rights in bankruptcy between self-employed and employees arises from legal structure, not discriminatory legislative provision; contractual pension rights are property under the Insolvency Act 1986 and vest in the trustee, and Article 14 ECHR is not offended. Human Rights Act 1998 does not apply retrospectively to pre-October 2000 acts.
- Parties
- Appellant: William Andrew Malcolm; Respondent: Benedict Mackenzie; Respondent: Allied Dunbar PLC; Intervenor: Secretary of State for Trade and Industry; Intervenor: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bankruptcy Estate, Pension Rights, Discrimination Under Article 14 ECHR, Interpretation of Statutes in Light of International Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Andrew Malcolm
Appellant
Benedict Mackenzie
Respondent
Allied Dunbar PLC
Respondent
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
Intervenor
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether treatment of self-employed retirement annuity contract as asset in bankruptcy violates Article 14 ECHR
- 2 Whether contractual pension rights should be excluded from bankruptcy estate under domestic law
- 3 Whether Human Rights Act 1998 applies retrospectively to pre-October 2000 acts
Ratio Decidendi
The differential treatment of pension rights in bankruptcy between self-employed and employees arises from legal structure, not discriminatory legislative provision; contractual pension rights are property under the Insolvency Act 1986 and vest in the trustee, and Article 14 ECHR is not offended. Human Rights Act 1998 does not apply retrospectively to pre-October 2000 acts.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Permission to add additional grounds refused
- Permission to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment