Millberry v R [2002] EWCA Crim 2891 (09 December 2002)

Millberry v R [2002] EWCA Crim 2891 (09 December 2002)

The Court adopted the Sentencing Advisory Panel's revised guidelines for rape, confirming that relationship, acquaintance, and stranger rape are to be treated with equal seriousness, and that aggravating and mitigating factors must be carefully weighed. The Court set out starting points for sentencing (5 years for single offence without aggravation, 8 years with aggravating features, 15 years for campaigns of rape, and life for offenders posing indefinite danger), and emphasized the need for individualized assessment. The Court upheld or adjusted sentences in the three appeals in line with these principles.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Crim 2891
Parties
Appellant: William Christopher Millberry; Appellant: Paul Robert Morgan; Appellant: Ian Stuart Lackenby; Respondent: R
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 December 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeals of Morgan and Lackenby dismissed as to sentence (with reduction of extended licence for Lackenby); Millberry's sentence reduced.
Legal Topics
Rape, Sentencing Guidelines, Aggravating Factors, Mitigating Factors, Relationship Rape, Anal Rape, Male Rape, Historic Offences, Extended Sentences
Criminal Law Rape Sentencing Guidelines Aggravating Factors Mitigating Factors Relationship Rape Anal Rape Male Rape +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

William Christopher Millberry

Appellant

Paul Robert Morgan

Appellant

Ian Stuart Lackenby

Appellant

R

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What are the appropriate sentencing guidelines for rape, including relationship and acquaintance rape, male rape, and anal rape?
  2. 2 How should aggravating and mitigating factors affect sentencing for rape?
  3. 3 What is the appropriate credit for guilty pleas in rape cases?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court adopted the Sentencing Advisory Panel's revised guidelines for rape, confirming that relationship, acquaintance, and stranger rape are to be treated with equal seriousness, and that aggravating and mitigating factors must be carefully weighed. The Court set out starting points for sentencing (5 years for single offence without aggravation, 8 years with aggravating features, 15 years for campaigns of rape, and life for offenders posing indefinite danger), and emphasized the need for individualized assessment. The Court upheld or adjusted sentences in the three appeals in line with these principles.

Court Disposition

Appeals of Morgan and Lackenby dismissed as to sentence (with reduction of extended licence for Lackenby); Millberry's sentence reduced.

Orders

  • Paul Robert Morgan: application dismissed, sentence of 9 years imprisonment and 5 years extended licence upheld.
  • Ian Stuart Lackenby: sentence of 10 years imprisonment upheld, extended licence reduced from 7 years to 4 years.