R v William Cosier
There was no sufficient evidence of loss of control to justify leaving the partial defence to the jury, as the appellant's actions were rational and deliberate before and after the stabbing, and there was no assertion or evidence of loss of control. The minimum term of 25 years was manifestly excessive given the mitigating factors, and should be reduced to 21 years and 134 days.
- Parties
- Respondent: R; Appellant: William Cosier
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Partial Defence, Loss of Control, Self Defence, Sentencing, Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Respondent
William Cosier
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to leave the partial defence of loss of control to the jury
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
There was no sufficient evidence of loss of control to justify leaving the partial defence to the jury, as the appellant's actions were rational and deliberate before and after the stabbing, and there was no assertion or evidence of loss of control. The minimum term of 25 years was manifestly excessive given the mitigating factors, and should be reduced to 21 years and 134 days.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part
Orders
- Conviction appeal dismissed
- Minimum term of imprisonment reduced from 25 years to 21 years and 134 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment