Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Ltd & Ors v Fattal & Ors
The transfer of trust assets to new trustees is an assignment within clause 12 of the JVA, but the Addendum authorises such transfers without consent for both the original and subsequent trustees. The BSL Trust requires the nominee members to act on the written instructions of each trust as to their proportionate membership rights, and the court may direct the admission of new members to reflect the trust interests. The appointment of a receiver and manager is not justified as there is no current jeopardy to the assets, independent trustees are now in place, and the majority rule structure must be respected.
- Parties
- Claimant: Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Limited; Claimant: Witco Limited; Claimant: Tiara Trustees Limited; Claimant: Nicholas Cuttiford; Defendant: William Fattal; Defendant: Elias Fattal; Defendant: Rysaffe Trustee Company (C. I.) Limited; Defendant: Charles Sofaer; Defendant: Simon Dangoor; Defendant: Robert Dangoor; Defendant: Berkeley Court Investments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (trusts/joint Venture/property) / Ruling on Applications (appointment of Receiver and Manager, Directions on Trust Asset Transfers, Trust Membership Issues)
- Outcome
- Applications for directions on trust asset transfers and BSL membership granted; application for appointment of receiver and manager dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appointment of Receiver and Manager, Interpretation of Joint Venture Agreements, Trustee Powers and Duties, Transfer of Trust Assets, Corporate Governance in Trust Structures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Limited
Claimant
Witco Limited
Claimant
Tiara Trustees Limited
Claimant
Nicholas Cuttiford
Claimant
William Fattal
Defendant
Elias Fattal
Defendant
Rysaffe Trustee Company (C. I.) Limited
Defendant
Charles Sofaer
Defendant
Simon Dangoor
Defendant
Robert Dangoor
Defendant
Berkeley Court Investments Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (trusts/joint Venture/property) / Ruling on Applications (appointment of Receiver and Manager, Directions on Trust Asset Transfers, Trust Membership Issues)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of trust assets to new trustees requires consent under the JVA and triggers pre-emption rights
- 2 Whether the BSL Trust allows for severance of membership rights and appointment of new members to reflect trust interests
- 3 Whether the appointment of a receiver and manager is justified to protect minority interests and facilitate sale of the property
Ratio Decidendi
The transfer of trust assets to new trustees is an assignment within clause 12 of the JVA, but the Addendum authorises such transfers without consent for both the original and subsequent trustees. The BSL Trust requires the nominee members to act on the written instructions of each trust as to their proportionate membership rights, and the court may direct the admission of new members to reflect the trust interests. The appointment of a receiver and manager is not justified as there is no current jeopardy to the assets, independent trustees are now in place, and the majority rule structure must be respected.
Court Disposition
Applications for directions on trust asset transfers and BSL membership granted; application for appointment of receiver and manager dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that transfer of trust assets to new trustees does not require consent under the JVA or trigger pre-emption rights, provided the Addendum conditions are met.
- Direction that new members may be admitted to BSL to reflect trust interests as per the BSL Trust.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment