William George Wright v (1) Margaret Ruth Blyth (2) Bridget Mary Rout (Practice and Procedure : Practice and Procedure) [2018] UKFTT 608 (PC) (03 September 2018)
The applicant's claim was found to be fanciful and unsustainable, justifying a direction to the Land Registry to reject any future applications by the applicant regarding the property.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 608 (PC)
- Parties
- Applicant: William George Wright; Respondent: Margaret Ruth Blyth; Respondent: Bridget Mary Rout
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Power to Order Rejection of Future Applications, Fraud, Forgery, Duress, Undue Influence, Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William George Wright
Applicant
Margaret Ruth Blyth
Respondent
Bridget Mary Rout
Respondent
Procedural Posture
First Tier Tribunal (property Chamber) / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to register the respondent's land in his name based on alleged purchase by his father and allegations of fraud
- 2 Whether the Tribunal should direct the Land Registry to reject future applications by the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's claim was found to be fanciful and unsustainable, justifying a direction to the Land Registry to reject any future applications by the applicant regarding the property.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Direction to Land Registry to reject future applications by the applicant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> William George Wright v (1) Margaret Ruth Blyth (2) Bridget Mary Rout (Practice and Procedure : Practice and Procedure) [2018] UKFTT 608 (PC) (03 September 2018) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2018/608.html Cite as: [2018] UKFTT 608 (PC) [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Decision summary REF/2017/0111 Case reference REF/2017/0111 Date of decision 03/09/2018 Adjudicator Ms Ann McAllister Applicant William George Wright Respondent (1) Margaret Ruth Blyth (2) Bridget Mary Rout Main Category & Sub Category Category Practice and Procedure Sub Category Power to order rejection of future applications Secondary Category & Sub Category Category Fraud, forgery, duress and undue influence Sub Category Evidence Decision notes [2018] UKFTT 608 (PC). Applicant's application to register Respondent's land in his name based on his belief that his father had bought all the land in 1953 and on allegations of fraud. Held case be fanciful and unsustainable - direction to Land Registry to reject future applications by Applicant made. Download decision(s) [2018] UKFTT 608 (PC) BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2018/608.html