Hussein v William Hill Group [2004] EWHC 208 (QB) (18 February 2004)

Hussein v William Hill Group [2004] EWHC 208 (QB) (18 February 2004)

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that he suffered the injuries, loss of earnings, or other losses claimed as a result of the assault. The only proven tort was a minor assault causing no significant injury, and only nominal damages are awarded.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 208
Parties
Claimant: Sayed Hussein; Defendant: William Hill Group
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; nominal damages awarded
Legal Topics
Assault, Damages, Loss of Earnings, Aggravated Damages, Slander
Tort Law Personal Injury Assault Damages Loss of Earnings Aggravated Damages Slander

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sayed Hussein

Claimant

William Hill Group

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Claim / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant suffered personal injury as alleged
  2. 2 Whether the claimant suffered loss of earnings as a result of the assault
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to aggravated damages

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that he suffered the injuries, loss of earnings, or other losses claimed as a result of the assault. The only proven tort was a minor assault causing no significant injury, and only nominal damages are awarded.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; nominal damages awarded

Orders

  • Judgment for claimant for nominal damages of £50.00
  • Written or oral submissions to be received on costs