Hussein v William Hill Group

Hussein v William Hill Group

The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that he suffered any significant physical or psychological injury, loss of earnings, or loss of a valuable watch as a result of the assault. The evidence was unreliable, contradictory, and exaggerated. Only nominal damages are justified.

Parties
Claimant: Sayed Hussein; Defendant: William Hill Group
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 February 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for claimant with nominal damages
Legal Topics
Assault, Damages, Loss of Earnings, Medical Evidence, Credibility of Witnesses
Tort Personal Injury Assault Damages Loss of Earnings Medical Evidence Credibility of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sayed Hussein

Claimant

William Hill Group

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant suffered personal injury as a result of the assault
  2. 2 Whether the claimant suffered loss of earnings attributable to the assault
  3. 3 Whether the claimant lost a watch as a result of the assault

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that he suffered any significant physical or psychological injury, loss of earnings, or loss of a valuable watch as a result of the assault. The evidence was unreliable, contradictory, and exaggerated. Only nominal damages are justified.

Court Disposition

Judgment for claimant with nominal damages

Orders

  • Claimant awarded nominal damages of £50.00
  • Written or oral submissions to be received on costs