Black, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 381 (23 February 2010)
The five-year sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offence and relevant sentencing precedents.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Crim 381
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: William James Black
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Arson, Sentencing, Recklessness, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
William James Black
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the five-year sentence for arson, being reckless as to whether life was endangered, was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The five-year sentence was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness of the offence and relevant sentencing precedents.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Sentence of five years' imprisonment upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment