Joseph, R. v
The judge correctly categorised the offence and applied the appropriate sentencing range; the sentence was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: William Joseph
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Money Laundering, Conspiracy to Convert Criminal Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Regina
Respondent
William Joseph
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
Ratio Decidendi
The judge correctly categorised the offence and applied the appropriate sentencing range; the sentence was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment